Brain Researcher
AI-assisted research infrastructure for neuroimaging
Turn neuroimaging questions into evidence-linked plans, runnable workflows, and reviewable scientific claims.
- datasets
- 1,600+
- tool specs
- 2,000+
- MCP tools
- 87
- workflows
- 60+
Tested across Claude, Codex, Gemini, GLM, DeepSeek, Kimi, and Qwen.
Install Claude Code
Get your token
Sign in to mint your personal MCP token (a one-time secret).
Configure MCP
Set the token in your shell first. Then keep the MCP config as a separate file.
Add this to ~/.bashrc, ~/.zshrc, or ~/.profile. Start Claude Code from an environment that inherits BR_MCP_TOKEN. Do not paste these export lines into .mcp.json.
# Brain Researcher MCP (add to ~/.bashrc, ~/.zshrc, or ~/.profile)
export BR_MCP_TOKEN="brk_<kid>.<secret>"
export BR_MCP_AUTH_HEADER="Bearer ${BR_MCP_TOKEN}"Paste only this config into .mcp.json. It reads BR_MCP_TOKEN from your client environment.
{
"mcpServers": {
"brain-researcher": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://brain-researcher.com/mcp",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "Bearer ${BR_MCP_TOKEN}",
"Accept": "application/json, text/event-stream"
}
}
}
}Now, just ask.
Same question, same agent. Brain Researcher adds dataset discovery and an inspectable recipe for local execution.
Read the paper, run the code
Bringing analytic rigor to agentic AI for science: The Brain Researcher platform for neuroimaging data analysis
AI agents can execute scientific analyses, but an analytic output becomes a defensible claim only after alternatives are weighed and the claim is limited to what the evidence supports. Agents may reproduce failures including selective analysis, premature declarations of success and optimization of imperfect criteria. We present Brain Researcher, an agentic research harness operating in a neuroimaging researcher's computational environment under rules for admissible analyses, required checks and claim scope. In benchmarks, Brain Researcher increased first-choice tool-selection accuracy across seven models by 70.2 percentage points (23.3% without it versus 93.6% with it) and verifiable grounding from 4.6% to 22.0%. In collaborator-led and self-evolving studies, multiverse analyses exposed analytic-choice sensitivity, and scientific review classified claims as accepted, qualified, revised, blocked, rejected or deferred. By linking decisions to evidence and provenance, Brain Researcher embeds methodological judgment within the workflow, not after it.
Brain Researcher
The full platform: Next.js web UI, FastAPI orchestrator + agent, 87 public MCP tools, 2,000+ registry tool specs, and the Neo4j knowledge graph. We're open-sourcing the shipped code and supported workflow paths so you can inspect and adapt them in your own environment.
Explore worked demos
Curated use cases with real evidence bundles, reports, and handoff context. Open one to walk the full research episode.